Data Handling Policy
How Harling Yorkshire Limited t/a DriverWell governs, protects, and processes personal data
Last updated: 1 September 2026 | Version 0.4 | Draft awaiting controller approval
1. Purpose and Scope
This Data Handling Policy sets out the principles, controls, and responsibilities that govern how DriverWell collects, stores, processes, transfers, and disposes of personal data. It applies to all staff, contractors, and service providers who access DriverWell systems or data.
This policy supports DriverWell's accountability programme under the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR). Compliance depends on the controls being implemented, tested, evidenced and reviewed. Open supplier, retention, access, incident and risk-assessment actions are not treated as completed controls.
Data Controller
Harling Yorkshire Limited t/a DriverWell
1 Wheelgate, Malton, North Yorkshire, England, YO17 7HT
Owner: Peter McKenna, Founder
Privacy contact: peter@www.driverwell.co.uk
2. Data Classification
All data held or processed by DriverWell must be classified according to the following scheme. Classification determines the controls that must be applied.
| Classification | Definition | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Public | Approved for public release with no restrictions | Marketing copy, app store descriptions, public blog posts |
| Internal | Internal use only; not for external distribution without authorisation | This policy, meeting notes, operational procedures |
| Confidential | Sensitive business or personal data; restricted to authorised personnel | User account data, support correspondence |
| Restricted | Highest sensitivity; access on a strict need-to-know basis only | Mood and mental health records, SOS contact data, security credentials |
All non-public personal data is classified as Confidential at minimum. Private mental health and wellbeing data, including mood scores and RoadMate conversations, is classified as Restricted. Forum contributions are public content under the member's chosen display name and must not be represented as private.
3. Employer Data Separation - Critical Control
Zero Employer Access Policy
Failure to maintain this separation would be a fundamental breach of user trust and a material legal risk.
No private individual record, mood data, health data, assessment answer, score, active-learning time, private reflection, course feedback or learner-support request may be shared with or exposed through employer, fleet-operator or transport-manager reporting.
Public forum boundary: A forum post or reply is an intentional public contribution shown under the member's chosen display name and may be read by anyone, including an employer. Forum content must never be included in an employer report or linked back to an employment record by DriverWell.
Fleet Operator Dashboard (B2B Feature):
DriverWell operates an optional, protected Fleet Dashboard accessible to verified fleet operators at /fleet. This dashboard is intended to display only threshold-protected, aggregate statistics about transport-worker engagement with wellbeing tools. No individual person's identity, mood score, health information or private usage history may be exposed through this dashboard.
Server-side reporting rules require a minimum cohort of ten (10) for engagement and usage statistics and twenty (20) for mood, fatigue or health-related data. If the applicable threshold is not met, the metric must be suppressed and shown as unavailable. These controls require ongoing regression testing whenever reporting logic changes.
Road Transport Learning Records:
Road Transport course records are private to the learner. A learner may separately opt in to allow only course-start and internal-completion status to contribute to an employer-level aggregate. The aggregate remains unavailable until at least ten linked learners have opted in. Assessment answers, scores, active-learning time, private reflections, feedback, complaints and support or reasonable-adjustment requests are excluded from employer reporting in all circumstances.
The Fleet Dashboard uses a separate access flow from individual Manus OAuth sign-in. Server-side authorisation and reporting tests must demonstrate that fleet access cannot retrieve individual wellbeing or learning data. No claim of cryptographic isolation is made without an independent design review.
Telematics Consent (Optional Driver Feature):
DriverWell has a preparatory consent interface for a possible future connected-driving feature. The reviewed consent route stores the person's consent choice, version, selected scope and withdrawal date. It does not itself store raw driving signals.
No connected signal ingestion is treated as launched until the supplier, intended use, data fields, retention, withdrawal deletion, DPIA and testing evidence have been approved. No raw telematics signal should be disclosed to a fleet operator through the wellbeing reporting flow.
This policy must be reviewed and explicitly reaffirmed by the Founder before any new B2B feature is scoped or built.
4. Access Controls
Access to personal data is governed by the principle of least privilege: individuals are granted only the access necessary to perform their specific role.
| Role | Access Level | Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Peter McKenna, Founder | Full administrative access | All systems |
| Developer (contractor) | No standing production access is approved by this draft; any support access must be time-limited and authorised | Evidence of current access assignments is pending |
| Support staff | No standing support role is documented; any future access must be approved for a defined purpose | Not currently evidenced |
| Third-party service providers | Limited to data required for contracted service | Per verified contract, DPA and supplier register entry |
Authentication requirements: Individual users sign in through Manus OAuth and a selected identity provider. Fleet credentials are handled through a separate application flow. MFA enforcement, password requirements, session duration and privileged-access evidence must be verified per system before being claimed.
Shared accounts and shared passwords are prohibited.
Access reviews: The Founder must review privileged access at least quarterly and promptly after being notified of a role change, contract end or suspected compromise. Each review must be recorded.
Data-rights access: The request register is restricted to administrators. Identity details may be removed from a completed register entry only after the action and evidence summary has been recorded.
Security incident access: Public receipts expose only the random reference, status and dates. Report detail, contact information, severity, investigation notes and resolution evidence are restricted to administrator procedures.
5. Storage and Encryption
Connection security: DriverWell's deployed public service is provided over HTTPS. The exact supported protocol configuration and certificate evidence must be captured during the security review.
Encryption at rest: Database and object-storage encryption details are pending documentary evidence from the platform supplier. DriverWell does not assert a particular algorithm until that evidence is held and reviewed.
Backups: Backup frequency, location, access, encryption, retention, restoration and post-restore deletion treatment are pending supplier evidence. A restoration may be authorised by the Founder only after the operational process is documented and tested.
Optional analytics: The platform analytics script and direct application analytics events are gated by the saved browser analytics choice. Session identifiers are not described as anonymous, and the maximum retention period remains an open controller action.
6. Incident Response
A personal data breach is any security incident that leads to the accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure of, or access to, personal data.
| Step | Action | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Receive and triage | Record the report, protect evidence and assign an owner | As soon as practicable |
| 2. Contain | Take proportionate steps to limit scope and impact | Priority based on the assessed risk |
| 3. Assess | Determine what data and people may be affected and assess likely risk | Begin without undue delay |
| 4. Notify ICO | Notify where the legal threshold is met | Without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware |
| 5. Notify affected people | Notify where the incident is likely to result in a high risk | Without undue delay where required |
| 6. Document | Record facts, decisions, actions, notifications and reasons in the breach register | During the incident and at closure |
| 7. Review | Complete a proportionate post-incident review and track corrective actions | Date set by the incident owner |
Operational intake: The public routes /security-incident and /security-incident-report use server validation, a database-backed source-fingerprint rate limit, no file upload, a random receipt and a status-only public lookup.
Restricted response record: Administrators can record status, severity, personal-data and health-data involvement, investigation notes, resolution and event history. Reporter identity details may be removed only after closure and a recorded reason.
Notification minimisation: The owner notification includes only the random reference and category. User-supplied summary, description and contact email remain in the restricted register.
Governance boundary: The workflow is implemented, but controller approval, a mock personal-data-breach exercise, a privileged-access review, supplier evidence and an independent security review remain open.
7. SOC 2 Readiness Roadmap
DriverWell is not claiming SOC 2 certification or readiness. The table below is an internal planning map only and identifies evidence that would be needed before commissioning a professional readiness assessment.
| Criteria | Relevant Controls | Status | Gap / Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC6 - Logical Access | Section 4 (Access Controls) | Gap | Implement and evidence access review, MFA and session controls |
| CC7 - System Operations | Section 6 (Incident Response) | Partial | Approve and exercise the implemented incident register, then obtain independent security review evidence |
| CC8 - Change Management | Not yet documented | Gap | Draft a change management policy covering code deployment |
| CC9 - Risk Mitigation | Supplier register drafted | Gap | Obtain DPAs, sub-processor evidence and review records |
| A1 - Availability | No verified supplier SLA in this pack | Gap | Obtain availability, backup and restoration evidence |
| C1 - Confidentiality | Sections 3 to 5 | Gap | Confirm encryption, access and transfer safeguards |
| P1-P8 - Privacy | Privacy Policy and retention schedule drafted | Gap | Complete and approve the ROPA and DPIAs |
Recommended next steps before commissioning a SOC 2 readiness assessment:
- Complete the Record of Processing Activities (ROPA) and keep it current
- Implement and evidence the quarterly privileged-access review required by section 4
- Draft a change management policy
- Establish a status page for uptime transparency
- Ensure all vendor Data Processing Agreements are signed and filed
- Conduct a DPIA for the RoadMate AI and mood check-in features
8. Policy Governance
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Peter McKenna, Founder (Harling Yorkshire Limited t/a DriverWell) | Owns this policy; responsible for compliance; approves all exceptions |
| Developers / Contractors | Follow this policy; report any suspected breaches immediately |
| Third-party processors | Must be bound by verified DPA obligations and notify DriverWell without undue delay in accordance with the applicable contract. Evidence status is tracked in the supplier register |
This policy must be reviewed at least annually, or following any personal data breach, material change to data processing activities, new B2B partnership, or change in applicable law or ICO guidance.
Related Documents
- Privacy Policy - public-facing user rights and data practices
- Record of Processing Activities (ROPA) - draft required and not yet controller-approved
- Data Retention Schedule - version 0.3 dated 1 September 2026, awaiting controller approval and further implementation
- Supplier and Processor Register - draft dated 1 September 2026, awaiting supplier evidence
- Data-Rights Request Register - authenticated submission and administrator review controls implemented; full cross-system erasure remains a controlled manual process
- Security Incident and Personal-Data Breach Response Procedure - version 0.1, operational draft awaiting controller approval and exercise evidence
- Security Incident Register - validated public intake, status-only receipt, restricted administrator review, immutable event history and post-closure identity minimisation implemented
This draft was reviewed against UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018 and ICO guidance accessed on 1 September 2026. It records open controls and is not a substitute for legal advice or an independent assurance review.
